Miscellaneous professional liability

 
»  NHL career cut short nets player $1.45 million in damages
»  $5 million awarded to B.C. couple in malpractice suit
»  Child and mother awarded more than $4 million for birth injury
»  Doctor, health authority to pay $3.2 million
»  Law firm to pay $9-million for withholding advice
»  Irvine wins photo use damages
»  University must pay $840,000 for wrongfully accused student

 



NHL career cut short nets player $1.45 million in damages

 
In 2002, the Nashville Predators drafted 18-year-old Joshua Morrow in the seventh round of the National Hockey League draft. He was considered a naturally powerful skater who could hit and fight. The following year, while playing hockey for the Kamloops Blazers in the Western Hockey League, Morrow was practising and took a slap shot that caused considerable pain in his right shoulder. He was referred to Dr. Ross Outerbridge, who operated on Morrow's shoulder. During surgery, the doctor made a serious error when he left two metal anchors sticking up from the bone. He failed to properly implant the anchors in the bone, causing further tearing to the cartilage. The outcome was significant damage to Morrow's shoulder, which ended his hockey career and left him with a future of painful and debilitating arthritis in his shoulder.

Morrow returned to the doctor after the surgery for follow-ups and complained of continued and aggravated pain. Outerbridge advised him that this was normal and to be expected.

 

The judge presiding over the case awarded Morrow general damages in the amount of $235,000. Past and future damages were also awarded in the range of $1.2 million, while future care costs were still to be determined at time of release. The judge found that Morrow ". . . did not fail to mitigate his loss. He was told repeatedly that he was fine (by Dr. Outerbridge), that his pain was normal and that he did not need further treatment."

 

You can read this verdict in its entirety at

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/04/2009BCSC0433.htm.

 

» Back to top

 
$5 million awarded to B.C. couple in malpractice suit

 
Shawn Kahlon, a 32-year-old teacher, was suffering from back pain and sought the advice of his physician. The doctor's initial diagnosis was back sprain and he recommended that Kahlon increase his exercise. Over the period of a year, Kahlon returned to his physician several times with similar aches and pains in his back. The doctor referred him to a sports medicine clinic to do further examinations. The doctor practising at the clinic sent him for a CT scan and x-ray of his lumbar spine. Upon reviewing the results, the radiologist requested that the patient return for a follow-up CT scan with contrast. Kahlon never went back for the follow-up scan, as he had expressed some concern with being injected with dye.

This decision had devastating consequences because Kahlon was in the early stages of developing spinal tuberculosis meningitis, which would eventually migrate to his brain, rendering him completely paralyzed on one side of his body and in need of around-the-clock care for the rest of his life. He had married just prior to developing the tuberculosis, and his wife Michelle has since dedicated her time to providing the care he requires on a constant and daily basis.

 

The clerks at the UBC Hospital attempted to set up the follow-up appointment, but failed to return the scans to the radiologist to file a report and forward to the family physician. These crucial steps "would have led to a chain of inquiry which would have resulted in a diagnosis of spinal TB meningitis. Treatment would have been given and Mr. Kahlon would have recovered without consequence," said B.C. Supreme Court Justice Jon Sigurdson. The judge's decision held the "UBC Hospital liable for its failure to have in place a system to monitor whether reports had been generated for all the films that were taken."

 

The judgment found the UBC Hospital 70-per-cent at fault and Kahlon 30-per-cent to blame for his decision not to follow through with the second CT scan. Damages were apportioned for attendant care, rehabilitation aide and special damages for Shawn and Michelle Kahlon and Shawn Kahlon's parents.

 

You can read this verdict in its entirety at http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/09/2009BCSC0922.htm.

 

» Back to top

 
Child and mother awarded more than $4 million for birth injury

 
The Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that three doctors and an attending nurse at B.C. Women's Hospital were found to have fallen below the standard of care expected of them during Monica Cojocaru's delivery of her son Eric Cojocaru.

The court awarded damages in the amount $4,045,000, with the largest portion being for future care costs, estimated at $2,665,000.

Cojocaru was 10 days overdue for the birth when she was admitted to B.C. Women's Hospital on the long weekend in May 2001. At the time, the hospital was under a job action by the Hospital Employees Union and operating under reduced staff.

 

Cojocaru should have been considered a high-risk patient due to having delivered her first child by Cesarean section in 1992.

 

Despite Cojocaru's repeated insistence that the impending birth be done by Cesarean, the doctors recommended a vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) and a prostaglandin induction.

 

Under poor supervision of the procedure, her uterus ruptured, and her son Eric suffered acute asphyxia and was born with significant brain damage.

 

For more on this case and discussion on the law regarding injury to a fetus, please refer to http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/04/2009BCSC0494.htm.

 

» Back to top

 
Doctor, health authority to pay $3.2 million

 
In the Supreme Court of British Columbia, an 11-year-old girl sued her mother's obstetrician and gynecologist, through the mother, for damages arising from serious injury during the girl's birth.

A failed attempt at a rotational "mid-level" forceps delivery procedure late in Carolyn Ediger's labour during the birth of Cassidy Ediger resulted in a bradycardia that deprived Cassidy of oxygen for an extended period. The subsequent delay in delivery by Cesarean section resulted in severe permanent brain damage.

The court found that Dr. William Johnston breached his standard of care in failing to provide adequate backup to perform a Cesarean section delivery, as is required when attempting a mid-level forceps delivery procedure. Further, the court found that Johnston failed to advise or consult with the mother about the risks associated with the forceps attempt, so Ediger was not able to provide informed consent to the procedure.

 

Also critical to this case was the court's review of the question of whether a physician owes a duty of care to a fetus.

 

You can read this verdict at

 

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/03/2009BCSC0386.htm.

 

» Back to top


 

Law firm to pay $9-million for withholding advice

 

A Toronto lawyer and his law firm have been ordered to pay nearly $9 million in damages and interest to a former client for their failure to warn him that his business partner was an ex-lawyer who had been jailed for fraud.

The judge said that the lawyer was caught in a "classic conflict of interest" when he decided to act for both the plaintiff and his business partner. The total damage award was $5,949,000, plus pre-judgment interest from January 1990.

The defendants subsequently appealed this verdict and the appeal court ordered a new trial.

 

 

» Back to top

 

Irvine wins photo use damages

 

Formula 1 driver Eddie Irvine has won increased damages of £25,000 (Cdn$57,000) against a radio station for using a doctored photograph of him in an advertising leaflet.

Irvine was also relieved from having to pay an estimated £300,000 (Cdn$684,000) bill for costs he faced following a High Court hearing in 2002.

The original photograph showed Irvine dressed in his racing gear and holding a mobile phone to his ear. The photograph was doctored so that the phone was replaced with a radio bearing the station's logo.

Although Irvine successfully sued TalkSport for its use of the amended photograph in 1999, he was awarded only £2,000 (Cdn$4,560) in damages. Mr. Justice Laddie said this represented a "reasonable endorsement fee."

Because these damages were less than the £5,000 (Cdn$11,400) out-of- court settlement fee offered by TalkSport, Irvine had to pay their legal costs in addition to his own.

Three judges at the Court of Appeal in London agreed that the High Court's initial award was too low. They ruled that Irvine would have commanded a fee of about £25,000 (Cdn$57,000) for the use of his image.

Irvine's counsel said that the racing driver's endorsement price was about £25,000 to £35,000 (Cdn$57,000 to Cdn$79,800).

"This is a case about celebrity endorsement," he said. "That is what makes money for the celebrities, and sells product for the producers.

"At the time, Irvine was at the peak of his career with Ferrari and finished second in the drivers' world championships.

 

 

» Back to top

 

University must pay $840,000 for wrongfully accused student

 

A Newfoundland court has ruled that two professors at Memorial University were wrong to report a female student to a child protection service. A paper written by the student in 1994 contained a first-hand account of a female teenager who had abused children in her care. The professors were disturbed by the paper and decided to report the student without discussing the issue with her. She was subjected to a two-year investigation by the child protection service.

The article, which was not footnoted, had been copied from another publication.

When the case was heard in September 2003, the court agreed that the professors' actions damaged the plaintiff's reputation and awarded her $840,000 in damages.

 

 

» Back to top